CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon D3100
vs Nikon D7100

Archive illustration for Nikon D3100

Nikon / 2010

D3100

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Nikon D7100

Nikon / 2013

D7100

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

356 mm²
D3100
367 mm²
D7100
Area ratio
1.03:1
Absolute difference
11 mm²
Relative difference
3.1%

The D7100 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 3 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

D3100MetricD7100
14.2 MPEffective pixels24.1 MP
23.1 × 15.4Sensor23.5 × 15.6
5.01 µmPixel pitch3.9 µm
25.05 µm²Pixel area15.21 µm²
3.99 MP/cm²Pixel density6.57 MP/cm²
1.56Crop factor1.53
1,920 × 1,080Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
505 gWeight675 g
SDHC, SDXC, Secure DigitalStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC x 2
Lithium-Ion EN-EL14 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion EN-EL15 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The D7100 has the larger sensor area. The D3100 has the lighter body. The D7100 has the higher effective resolution. The D7100 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose D3100

Released in 2010, D3100 has about 356 mm² of sensor area, 14.2 MP effective resolution, and a 505 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose D7100

Released in 2013, D7100 has about 367 mm² of sensor area, 24.1 MP effective resolution, and a 675 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras