CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon D2Hs
vs Sigma SD10

Archive illustration for Nikon D2Hs

Nikon / 2005

D2Hs

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Sigma SD10

Sigma / 2003

SD10

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

357 mm²
D2Hs
286 mm²
SD10
Area ratio
1.25:1
Absolute difference
72 mm²
Relative difference
25.1%

The D2Hs has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

D2HsMetricSD10
4.1 MPEffective pixels3.4 MP
23.2 × 15.4Sensor20.7 × 13.8
9.33 µmPixel pitch9.17 µm
87.14 µm²Pixel area84.02 µm²
1.15 MP/cm²Pixel density1.19 MP/cm²
1.55Crop factor1.74
—Maximum video—
1,070 gWeight950 g
CompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, MicrodriveStorageCompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, Microdrive
Nikon EN-EL5 Lithium-Ion included Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The D2Hs has the larger sensor area. The SD10 has the lighter body. The D2Hs has the higher effective resolution. The D2Hs is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose D2Hs

Released in 2005, D2Hs has about 357 mm² of sensor area, 4.1 MP effective resolution, and a 1,070 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose SD10

Released in 2003, SD10 has about 286 mm² of sensor area, 3.4 MP effective resolution, and a 950 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras