CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon Coolpix P900
vs Olympus Stylus SH-2

Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix P900

Nikon / 2015

Coolpix P900

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus Stylus SH-2

Olympus / 2015

Stylus SH-2

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Coolpix P900
28 mm²
Stylus SH-2
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Coolpix P900 and Stylus SH-2 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Coolpix P900MetricStylus SH-2
16 MPEffective pixels16 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.33 µm
1.78 µm²Pixel area1.78 µm²
56.22 MP/cm²Pixel density56.22 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
1,920 × 1,080Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
899 gWeight271 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Rechargeable Li-ion Battery EN-EL23 Li-ion batteryBatteryLI-92B Rechargeable Lithium-Ion Battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Coolpix P900 and Stylus SH-2 have the same sensor area. The Stylus SH-2 has the lighter body. The Coolpix P900 and Stylus SH-2 have the same effective resolution. The Coolpix P900 and Stylus SH-2 were both released in 2015. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Coolpix P900

Released in 2015, Coolpix P900 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 899 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Stylus SH-2

Released in 2015, Stylus SH-2 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16 MP effective resolution, and a 271 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras