CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon Coolpix L29
vs Nikon Coolpix L320

Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix L29

Nikon / 2014

Coolpix L29

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix L320

Nikon / 2013

Coolpix L320

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
Coolpix L29
28 mm²
Coolpix L320
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Coolpix L29 and Coolpix L320 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Coolpix L29MetricCoolpix L320
16.1 MPEffective pixels16.1 MP
6.16 × 4.62Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.33 µmPixel pitch1.33 µm
1.77 µm²Pixel area1.77 µm²
56.57 MP/cm²Pixel density56.57 MP/cm²
5.62Crop factor5.62
1,280 × 720Maximum video1,280 × 720
160 gWeight430 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
2 AA-size batteriesBattery4 x AA batteries

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Coolpix L29 and Coolpix L320 have the same sensor area. The Coolpix L29 has the lighter body. The Coolpix L29 and Coolpix L320 have the same effective resolution. The Coolpix L29 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Coolpix L29

Released in 2014, Coolpix L29 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.1 MP effective resolution, and a 160 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Coolpix L320

Released in 2013, Coolpix L320 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 16.1 MP effective resolution, and a 430 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras