CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon Coolpix L16
vs Samsung NV3

Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix L16

Nikon / 2008

Coolpix L16

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Samsung NV3

Samsung / 2006

NV3

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
Coolpix L16
25 mm²
NV3
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Coolpix L16 and NV3 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Coolpix L16MetricNV3
7.1 MPEffective pixels7.1 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.87 µmPixel pitch1.87 µm
3.5 µm²Pixel area3.5 µm²
28.58 MP/cm²Pixel density28.58 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
125 gWeight142 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Coolpix L16 and NV3 have the same sensor area. The Coolpix L16 has the lighter body. The Coolpix L16 and NV3 have the same effective resolution. The Coolpix L16 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Coolpix L16

Released in 2008, Coolpix L16 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 7.1 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose NV3

Released in 2006, NV3 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 7.1 MP effective resolution, and a 142 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras