Reasons to choose Coolpix L16
Released in 2008, Coolpix L16 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 7.1 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Nikon Coolpix L16
vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-LS2
VS
Sensor area
25 mm²
Coolpix L1625 mm²
Lumix DMC-LS2- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The Coolpix L16 and Lumix DMC-LS2 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
Coolpix L16MetricLumix DMC-LS2
7.1 MPEffective pixels5 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
1.87 µmPixel pitch2.23 µm
3.5 µm²Pixel area4.97 µm²
28.58 MP/cm²Pixel density20.13 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
125 gWeight138 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The Coolpix L16 and Lumix DMC-LS2 have the same sensor area. The Coolpix L16 has the lighter body. The Coolpix L16 has the higher effective resolution. The Coolpix L16 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Lumix DMC-LS2
Released in 2006, Lumix DMC-LS2 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 138 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.