CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon Coolpix 950
vs Nikon Coolpix 990

Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix 950

Nikon / 1999

Coolpix 950

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix 990

Nikon / 2000

Coolpix 990

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
Coolpix 950
38 mm²
Coolpix 990
Area ratio
1.23:1
Absolute difference
7 mm²
Relative difference
23.4%

The Coolpix 990 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Coolpix 950MetricCoolpix 990
1.9 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor7.11 × 5.33
4.02 µmPixel pitch3.5 µm
16.17 µm²Pixel area12.22 µm²
6.18 MP/cm²Pixel density8.18 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
350 gWeight525 g
CompactFlash type IStorageCompactFlash type I
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Coolpix 990 has the larger sensor area. The Coolpix 950 has the lighter body. The Coolpix 990 has the higher effective resolution. The Coolpix 990 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Coolpix 950

Released in 1999, Coolpix 950 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 350 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Coolpix 990

Released in 2000, Coolpix 990 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 525 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras