CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon Coolpix 5700
vs Pentax EI-2000

Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix 5700

Nikon / 2002

Coolpix 5700

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Pentax EI-2000

Pentax / 2000

EI-2000

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

58 mm²
Coolpix 5700
58 mm²
EI-2000
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Coolpix 5700 and EI-2000 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Coolpix 5700MetricEI-2000
4.9 MPEffective pixels1.9 MP
8.8 × 6.6Sensor8.8 × 6.6
3.44 µmPixel pitch5.53 µm
11.85 µm²Pixel area30.57 µm²
8.44 MP/cm²Pixel density3.27 MP/cm²
3.93Crop factor3.93
—Maximum video—
530 gWeight630 g
CompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, MicrodriveStorageCompact Flash
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Coolpix 5700 and EI-2000 have the same sensor area. The Coolpix 5700 has the lighter body. The Coolpix 5700 has the higher effective resolution. The Coolpix 5700 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Coolpix 5700

Released in 2002, Coolpix 5700 has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 4.9 MP effective resolution, and a 530 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EI-2000

Released in 2000, EI-2000 has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 630 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras