CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon Coolpix 5000
vs Nikon Coolpix 995

Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix 5000

Nikon / 2001

Coolpix 5000

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix 995

Nikon / 2001

Coolpix 995

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

58 mm²
Coolpix 5000
38 mm²
Coolpix 995
Area ratio
1.53:1
Absolute difference
20 mm²
Relative difference
53.3%

The Coolpix 5000 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Coolpix 5000MetricCoolpix 995
4.9 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
8.8 × 6.6Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.44 µmPixel pitch3.5 µm
11.85 µm²Pixel area12.22 µm²
8.44 MP/cm²Pixel density8.18 MP/cm²
3.93Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
360 gWeight475 g
CompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, MicrodriveStorageCompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, Microdrive
Nikon EN-EL1 Lithium-Ion included Li-ion batteryBatteryNikon EN-EL1 Lithium-Ion included Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Coolpix 5000 has the larger sensor area. The Coolpix 5000 has the lighter body. The Coolpix 5000 has the higher effective resolution. The Coolpix 5000 and Coolpix 995 were both released in 2001. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Coolpix 5000

Released in 2001, Coolpix 5000 has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 4.9 MP effective resolution, and a 360 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Coolpix 995

Released in 2001, Coolpix 995 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 475 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras