CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon Coolpix 4500
vs Nikon Coolpix 5700

Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix 4500

Nikon / 2002

Coolpix 4500

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix 5700

Nikon / 2002

Coolpix 5700

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Coolpix 4500
58 mm²
Coolpix 5700
Area ratio
1.53:1
Absolute difference
20 mm²
Relative difference
53.3%

The Coolpix 5700 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Coolpix 4500MetricCoolpix 5700
3.9 MPEffective pixels4.9 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor8.8 × 6.6
3.12 µmPixel pitch3.44 µm
9.72 µm²Pixel area11.85 µm²
10.29 MP/cm²Pixel density8.44 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor3.93
—Maximum video—
420 gWeight530 g
CompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, MicrodriveStorageCompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, Microdrive
Nikon EN-EL1 Lithium-Ion included Li-ion batteryBatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Coolpix 5700 has the larger sensor area. The Coolpix 4500 has the lighter body. The Coolpix 5700 has the higher effective resolution. The Coolpix 4500 and Coolpix 5700 were both released in 2002. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Coolpix 4500

Released in 2002, Coolpix 4500 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.9 MP effective resolution, and a 420 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Coolpix 5700

Released in 2002, Coolpix 5700 has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 4.9 MP effective resolution, and a 530 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras