CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon Coolpix 2100
vs Olympus C-100

Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix 2100

Nikon / 2003

Coolpix 2100

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus C-100

Olympus / 2001

C-100

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

15 mm²
Coolpix 2100
15 mm²
C-100
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Coolpix 2100 and C-100 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Coolpix 2100MetricC-100
1.9 MPEffective pixels1.3 MP
4.5 × 3.37Sensor4.5 × 3.37
2.83 µmPixel pitch3.42 µm
7.98 µm²Pixel area11.67 µm²
12.53 MP/cm²Pixel density8.57 MP/cm²
7.7Crop factor7.7
—Maximum video—
200 gWeight190 g
CompactFlash type IStorageSmartMedia
AA NiMH (2) batteries includedBattery2x CR-V3, 4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Coolpix 2100 and C-100 have the same sensor area. The C-100 has the lighter body. The Coolpix 2100 has the higher effective resolution. The Coolpix 2100 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Coolpix 2100

Released in 2003, Coolpix 2100 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose C-100

Released in 2001, C-100 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 1.3 MP effective resolution, and a 190 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras