CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon Coolpix 2000
vs Nikon Coolpix 2500

Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix 2000

Nikon / 2002

Coolpix 2000

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix 2500

Nikon / 2002

Coolpix 2500

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
Coolpix 2000
21 mm²
Coolpix 2500
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Coolpix 2000 and Coolpix 2500 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Coolpix 2000MetricCoolpix 2500
1.9 MPEffective pixels1.9 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
3.35 µmPixel pitch3.35 µm
11.22 µm²Pixel area11.22 µm²
8.91 MP/cm²Pixel density8.91 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
280 gWeight205 g
CompactFlash type IStorageCompactFlash type I
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryNikon EN-EL2 Lithium-Ion included Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Coolpix 2000 and Coolpix 2500 have the same sensor area. The Coolpix 2500 has the lighter body. The Coolpix 2000 and Coolpix 2500 have the same effective resolution. The Coolpix 2000 and Coolpix 2500 were both released in 2002. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Coolpix 2000

Released in 2002, Coolpix 2000 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 280 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Coolpix 2500

Released in 2002, Coolpix 2500 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 1.9 MP effective resolution, and a 205 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras