CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon Coolpix 100
vs Olympus C-820L

Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix 100

Nikon / 1997

Coolpix 100

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus C-820L

Olympus / 1997

C-820L

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

17 mm²
Coolpix 100
17 mm²
C-820L
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Coolpix 100 and C-820L have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Coolpix 100MetricC-820L
0.3 MPEffective pixels0.81 MP
4.8 × 3.6Sensor4.8 × 3.6
7.59 µmPixel pitch4.62 µm
57.6 µm²Pixel area21.33 µm²
1.74 MP/cm²Pixel density4.69 MP/cm²
7.21Crop factor7.21
—Maximum video—
200 gWeight340 g
Internal storageStorageSmartMedia
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)Battery4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Coolpix 100 and C-820L have the same sensor area. The Coolpix 100 has the lighter body. The C-820L has the higher effective resolution. The Coolpix 100 and C-820L were both released in 1997. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Coolpix 100

Released in 1997, Coolpix 100 has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 0.3 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose C-820L

Released in 1997, C-820L has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 0.81 MP effective resolution, and a 340 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras