CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon Coolpix 100
vs Nikon Coolpix 300

Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix 100

Nikon / 1997

Coolpix 100

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Nikon Coolpix 300

Nikon / 1997

Coolpix 300

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

17 mm²
Coolpix 100
17 mm²
Coolpix 300
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Coolpix 100 and Coolpix 300 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Coolpix 100MetricCoolpix 300
0.3 MPEffective pixels0.3 MP
4.8 × 3.6Sensor4.8 × 3.6
7.59 µmPixel pitch7.59 µm
57.6 µm²Pixel area57.6 µm²
1.74 MP/cm²Pixel density1.74 MP/cm²
7.21Crop factor7.21
—Maximum video—
200 gWeight250 g
Internal storageStorageInternal storage
AA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Coolpix 100 and Coolpix 300 have the same sensor area. The Coolpix 100 has the lighter body. The Coolpix 100 and Coolpix 300 have the same effective resolution. The Coolpix 100 and Coolpix 300 were both released in 1997. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Coolpix 100

Released in 1997, Coolpix 100 has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 0.3 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Coolpix 300

Released in 1997, Coolpix 300 has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 0.3 MP effective resolution, and a 250 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras