CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Nikon 1 S2
vs Nikon 1 V3

Archive illustration for Nikon 1 S2

Nikon / 2014

1 S2

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Nikon 1 V3

Nikon / 2014

1 V3

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

116 mm²
1 S2
116 mm²
1 V3
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The 1 S2 and 1 V3 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

1 S2Metric1 V3
14.2 MPEffective pixels18.4 MP
13.2 × 8.8Sensor13.2 × 8.8
2.86 µmPixel pitch2.51 µm
8.18 µm²Pixel area6.31 µm²
12.22 MP/cm²Pixel density15.84 MP/cm²
2.73Crop factor2.73
1,920 × 1,080Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
190 gWeight324 g
microSD/microSDHC/microSDXCStoragemicroSD/microSDHC/microSDXC
EN-EL22 Lithium-ion battery Li-ion batteryBatteryEN-EL20a lithium-ion battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The 1 S2 and 1 V3 have the same sensor area. The 1 S2 has the lighter body. The 1 V3 has the higher effective resolution. The 1 S2 and 1 V3 were both released in 2014. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose 1 S2

Released in 2014, 1 S2 has about 116 mm² of sensor area, 14.2 MP effective resolution, and a 190 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose 1 V3

Released in 2014, 1 V3 has about 116 mm² of sensor area, 18.4 MP effective resolution, and a 324 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras