CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Minox DD100
vs Minox Rolleiflex MiniDigi

Archive illustration for Minox DD100

Minox / 2004

DD100

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Minox Rolleiflex MiniDigi

Minox / 2004

Rolleiflex MiniDigi

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
DD100
31 mm²
Rolleiflex MiniDigi
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DD100 and Rolleiflex MiniDigi have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DD100MetricRolleiflex MiniDigi
2.1 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor6.4 × 4.8
3.82 µmPixel pitch3.15 µm
14.63 µm²Pixel area9.91 µm²
6.84 MP/cm²Pixel density10.09 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
100 gWeight100 g
Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AAABattery1x CR2 Lithium

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DD100 and Rolleiflex MiniDigi have the same sensor area. The DD100 and Rolleiflex MiniDigi have the same body weight. The Rolleiflex MiniDigi has the higher effective resolution. The DD100 and Rolleiflex MiniDigi were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DD100

Released in 2004, DD100 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2.1 MP effective resolution, and a 100 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Rolleiflex MiniDigi

Released in 2004, Rolleiflex MiniDigi has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 100 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras