Reasons to choose DC 6311
Released in 2004, DC 6311 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6.36 MP effective resolution, and a 180 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Minox DC 6311
vs Minox Rolleiflex MiniDigi
VS
Sensor area
38 mm²
DC 631131 mm²
Rolleiflex MiniDigi- Area ratio
- 1.23:1
- Absolute difference
- 7 mm²
- Relative difference
- 23.4%
The DC 6311 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.
Key specification differences
DC 6311MetricRolleiflex MiniDigi
6.36 MPEffective pixels3.1 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor6.4 × 4.8
2.44 µmPixel pitch3.15 µm
5.96 µm²Pixel area9.91 µm²
16.78 MP/cm²Pixel density10.09 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
180 gWeight100 g
Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery1x CR2 Lithium
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DC 6311 has the larger sensor area. The Rolleiflex MiniDigi has the lighter body. The DC 6311 has the higher effective resolution. The DC 6311 and Rolleiflex MiniDigi were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Rolleiflex MiniDigi
Released in 2004, Rolleiflex MiniDigi has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.1 MP effective resolution, and a 100 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.