CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Minox DC 4211
vs Minox DD200

Archive illustration for Minox DC 4211

Minox / 2004

DC 4211

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Minox DD200

Minox / 2004

DD200

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
DC 4211
31 mm²
DD200
Area ratio
1.24:1
Absolute difference
6 mm²
Relative difference
23.7%

The DD200 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

DC 4211MetricDD200
4.2 MPEffective pixels3.2 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor6.4 × 4.8
2.43 µmPixel pitch3.1 µm
5.91 µm²Pixel area9.6 µm²
16.91 MP/cm²Pixel density10.42 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
125 gWeight100 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery2x AAA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DD200 has the larger sensor area. The DD200 has the lighter body. The DC 4211 has the higher effective resolution. The DC 4211 and DD200 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC 4211

Released in 2004, DC 4211 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 4.2 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DD200

Released in 2004, DD200 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 100 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras