CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Minox DC 3311
vs Minox DD1

Archive illustration for Minox DC 3311

Minox / 2002

DC 3311

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Minox DD1

Minox / 2003

DD1

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
DC 3311
31 mm²
DD1
Area ratio
1.23:1
Absolute difference
7 mm²
Relative difference
23.4%

The DC 3311 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DC 3311MetricDD1
3.2 MPEffective pixels2.1 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor6.4 × 4.8
3.44 µmPixel pitch3.82 µm
11.84 µm²Pixel area14.63 µm²
8.44 MP/cm²Pixel density6.84 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor5.41
—Maximum video—
330 gWeight120 g
CompactFlash type IStorage—
4x AABattery1x CR2 Lithium

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC 3311 has the larger sensor area. The DD1 has the lighter body. The DC 3311 has the higher effective resolution. The DD1 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DC 3311

Released in 2002, DC 3311 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 330 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DD1

Released in 2003, DD1 has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 2.1 MP effective resolution, and a 120 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras