CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Minox Classic Leica M3 5MP
vs Minox DC 6311

Archive illustration for Minox Classic Leica M3 5MP

Minox / 2004

Classic Leica M3 5MP

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Minox DC 6311

Minox / 2004

DC 6311

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

31 mm²
Classic Leica M3 5MP
38 mm²
DC 6311
Area ratio
1.23:1
Absolute difference
7 mm²
Relative difference
23.4%

The DC 6311 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

Classic Leica M3 5MPMetricDC 6311
3.2 MPEffective pixels6.36 MP
6.4 × 4.8Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.1 µmPixel pitch2.44 µm
9.6 µm²Pixel area5.96 µm²
10.42 MP/cm²Pixel density16.78 MP/cm²
5.41Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
—Weight180 g
Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DC 6311 has the larger sensor area. The Classic Leica M3 5MP has the lighter body. The DC 6311 has the higher effective resolution. The Classic Leica M3 5MP and DC 6311 were both released in 2004. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Classic Leica M3 5MP

Released in 2004, Classic Leica M3 5MP has about 31 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DC 6311

Released in 2004, DC 6311 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 6.36 MP effective resolution, and a 180 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras