CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Minolta DiMAGE F200
vs Olympus C-40 Zoom

Archive illustration for Minolta DiMAGE F200

Minolta / 2003

DiMAGE F200

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus C-40 Zoom

Olympus / 2001

C-40 Zoom

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
DiMAGE F200
38 mm²
C-40 Zoom
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DiMAGE F200 and C-40 Zoom have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DiMAGE F200MetricC-40 Zoom
4.1 MPEffective pixels4.13 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.04 µmPixel pitch3.03 µm
9.24 µm²Pixel area9.18 µm²
10.82 MP/cm²Pixel density10.9 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
245 gWeight230 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSmartMedia
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)Battery1x CR-V3, 2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DiMAGE F200 and C-40 Zoom have the same sensor area. The C-40 Zoom has the lighter body. The C-40 Zoom has the higher effective resolution. The DiMAGE F200 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DiMAGE F200

Released in 2003, DiMAGE F200 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4.1 MP effective resolution, and a 245 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose C-40 Zoom

Released in 2001, C-40 Zoom has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4.13 MP effective resolution, and a 230 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras