CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Minolta DiMAGE F200
vs Minolta DiMAGE F300

Archive illustration for Minolta DiMAGE F200

Minolta / 2003

DiMAGE F200

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Minolta DiMAGE F300

Minolta / 2003

DiMAGE F300

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
DiMAGE F200
38 mm²
DiMAGE F300
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DiMAGE F200 and DiMAGE F300 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DiMAGE F200MetricDiMAGE F300
4.1 MPEffective pixels5.24 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.04 µmPixel pitch2.69 µm
9.24 µm²Pixel area7.23 µm²
10.82 MP/cm²Pixel density13.83 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
245 gWeight245 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA NiMH (4) batteries (supplied)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DiMAGE F200 and DiMAGE F300 have the same sensor area. The DiMAGE F200 and DiMAGE F300 have the same body weight. The DiMAGE F300 has the higher effective resolution. The DiMAGE F200 and DiMAGE F300 were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DiMAGE F200

Released in 2003, DiMAGE F200 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4.1 MP effective resolution, and a 245 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DiMAGE F300

Released in 2003, DiMAGE F300 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 5.24 MP effective resolution, and a 245 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras