CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Minolta DiMAGE E323
vs Minolta DiMAGE Xt

Archive illustration for Minolta DiMAGE E323

Minolta / 2003

DiMAGE E323

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Minolta DiMAGE Xt

Minolta / 2003

DiMAGE Xt

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

21 mm²
DiMAGE E323
21 mm²
DiMAGE Xt
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The DiMAGE E323 and DiMAGE Xt have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

DiMAGE E323MetricDiMAGE Xt
3.2 MPEffective pixels3.34 MP
5.33 × 4Sensor5.33 × 4
2.58 µmPixel pitch2.53 µm
6.66 µm²Pixel area6.38 µm²
15.01 MP/cm²Pixel density15.67 MP/cm²
6.49Crop factor6.49
—Maximum video—
145 gWeight146 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryLithium-Ion (NP-200) Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DiMAGE E323 and DiMAGE Xt have the same sensor area. The DiMAGE E323 has the lighter body. The DiMAGE Xt has the higher effective resolution. The DiMAGE E323 and DiMAGE Xt were both released in 2003. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DiMAGE E323

Released in 2003, DiMAGE E323 has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 145 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DiMAGE Xt

Released in 2003, DiMAGE Xt has about 21 mm² of sensor area, 3.34 MP effective resolution, and a 146 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras