CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Minolta DiMAGE 2300
vs Minolta DiMAGE 5

Archive illustration for Minolta DiMAGE 2300

Minolta / 2000

DiMAGE 2300

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Minolta DiMAGE 5

Minolta / 2001

DiMAGE 5

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

42 mm²
DiMAGE 2300
38 mm²
DiMAGE 5
Area ratio
1.12:1
Absolute difference
5 mm²
Relative difference
12.1%

The DiMAGE 2300 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

DiMAGE 2300MetricDiMAGE 5
2.3 MPEffective pixels3.34 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor7.11 × 5.33
4.3 µmPixel pitch3.37 µm
18.46 µm²Pixel area11.35 µm²
5.42 MP/cm²Pixel density8.81 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
300 gWeight650 g
CompactFlash type IStorageCompactFlash type I, CompactFlash type II, Microdrive
AA NiMH (4) batteries (supplied)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The DiMAGE 2300 has the larger sensor area. The DiMAGE 2300 has the lighter body. The DiMAGE 5 has the higher effective resolution. The DiMAGE 5 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose DiMAGE 2300

Released in 2000, DiMAGE 2300 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 2.3 MP effective resolution, and a 300 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose DiMAGE 5

Released in 2001, DiMAGE 5 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.34 MP effective resolution, and a 650 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras