CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Leica X (Typ 113)
vs Leica X2

Archive illustration for Leica X (Typ 113)

Leica / 2014

X (Typ 113)

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Leica X2

Leica / 2012

X2

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

371 mm²
X (Typ 113)
373 mm²
X2
Area ratio
1.01:1
Absolute difference
2 mm²
Relative difference
0.6%

The X2 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

X (Typ 113)MetricX2
16.2 MPEffective pixels16.2 MP
23.6 × 15.7Sensor23.6 × 15.8
4.78 µmPixel pitch4.8 µm
22.87 µm²Pixel area23.02 µm²
4.37 MP/cm²Pixel density4.34 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1.52
1,920 × 1,080Maximum video—
486 gWeight345 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC card
Lithium ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The X2 has the larger sensor area. The X2 has the lighter body. The X (Typ 113) and X2 have the same effective resolution. The X (Typ 113) is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose X (Typ 113)

Released in 2014, X (Typ 113) has about 371 mm² of sensor area, 16.2 MP effective resolution, and a 486 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose X2

Released in 2012, X2 has about 373 mm² of sensor area, 16.2 MP effective resolution, and a 345 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras