CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Leica M9
vs Leica X1

Archive illustration for Leica M9

Leica / 2009

M9

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Leica X1

Leica / 2009

X1

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

856 mm²
M9
373 mm²
X1
Area ratio
2.29:1
Absolute difference
483 mm²
Relative difference
129.5%

The M9 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

M9MetricX1
18 MPEffective pixels12.2 MP
35.8 × 23.9Sensor23.6 × 15.8
6.89 µmPixel pitch5.53 µm
47.53 µm²Pixel area30.56 µm²
2.1 MP/cm²Pixel density3.27 MP/cm²
1.01Crop factor1.52
—Maximum video—
585 gWeight306 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSD/SDHC
Lithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryBP-DC8 Rechargeable Lithium-Ion Battery Pack Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The M9 has the larger sensor area. The X1 has the lighter body. The M9 has the higher effective resolution. The M9 and X1 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose M9

Released in 2009, M9 has about 856 mm² of sensor area, 18 MP effective resolution, and a 585 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose X1

Released in 2009, X1 has about 373 mm² of sensor area, 12.2 MP effective resolution, and a 306 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras