CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Leica M8
vs Leica M8.2

Archive illustration for Leica M8

Leica / 2006

M8

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Leica M8.2

Leica / 2008

M8.2

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

486 mm²
M8
486 mm²
M8.2
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The M8 and M8.2 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

M8MetricM8.2
10.3 MPEffective pixels10.3 MP
27 × 18Sensor27 × 18
6.87 µmPixel pitch6.87 µm
47.18 µm²Pixel area47.18 µm²
2.12 MP/cm²Pixel density2.12 MP/cm²
1.33Crop factor1.33
—Maximum video—
591 gWeight591 g
Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The M8 and M8.2 have the same sensor area. The M8 and M8.2 have the same body weight. The M8 and M8.2 have the same effective resolution. The M8.2 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose M8

Released in 2006, M8 has about 486 mm² of sensor area, 10.3 MP effective resolution, and a 591 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose M8.2

Released in 2008, M8.2 has about 486 mm² of sensor area, 10.3 MP effective resolution, and a 591 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras