CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Leica M8.2
vs Leica M9

Archive illustration for Leica M8.2

Leica / 2008

M8.2

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Leica M9

Leica / 2009

M9

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

486 mm²
M8.2
856 mm²
M9
Area ratio
1.76:1
Absolute difference
370 mm²
Relative difference
76.1%

The M9 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

M8.2MetricM9
10.3 MPEffective pixels18 MP
27 × 18Sensor35.8 × 23.9
6.87 µmPixel pitch6.89 µm
47.18 µm²Pixel area47.53 µm²
2.12 MP/cm²Pixel density2.1 MP/cm²
1.33Crop factor1.01
—Maximum video—
591 gWeight585 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The M9 has the larger sensor area. The M9 has the lighter body. The M9 has the higher effective resolution. The M9 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose M8.2

Released in 2008, M8.2 has about 486 mm² of sensor area, 10.3 MP effective resolution, and a 591 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose M9

Released in 2009, M9 has about 856 mm² of sensor area, 18 MP effective resolution, and a 585 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras