CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Leica M-Monochrom
vs Leica M Typ 240

Archive illustration for Leica M-Monochrom

Leica / 2012

M-Monochrom

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Leica M Typ 240

Leica / 2012

M Typ 240

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

856 mm²
M-Monochrom
864 mm²
M Typ 240
Area ratio
1.01:1
Absolute difference
8 mm²
Relative difference
1%

The M Typ 240 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

M-MonochromMetricM Typ 240
18 MPEffective pixels24 MP
35.8 × 23.9Sensor36 × 24
6.89 µmPixel pitch6 µm
47.53 µm²Pixel area36 µm²
2.1 MP/cm²Pixel density2.78 MP/cm²
1.01Crop factor1
—Maximum video1,920 × 1,080
600 gWeight680 g
SD/SDHC cardStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
Lithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The M Typ 240 has the larger sensor area. The M-Monochrom has the lighter body. The M Typ 240 has the higher effective resolution. The M-Monochrom and M Typ 240 were both released in 2012. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose M-Monochrom

Released in 2012, M-Monochrom has about 856 mm² of sensor area, 18 MP effective resolution, and a 600 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose M Typ 240

Released in 2012, M Typ 240 has about 864 mm² of sensor area, 24 MP effective resolution, and a 680 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras