CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Leica Digilux 1
vs Leica Digilux 2

Archive illustration for Leica Digilux 1

Leica / 2002

Digilux 1

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Leica Digilux 2

Leica / 2003

Digilux 2

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

42 mm²
Digilux 1
58 mm²
Digilux 2
Area ratio
1.37:1
Absolute difference
16 mm²
Relative difference
36.8%

The Digilux 2 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Digilux 1MetricDigilux 2
3.9 MPEffective pixels4.9 MP
7.53 × 5.64Sensor8.8 × 6.6
3.3 µmPixel pitch3.44 µm
10.89 µm²Pixel area11.85 µm²
9.18 MP/cm²Pixel density8.44 MP/cm²
4.6Crop factor3.93
—Maximum video—
455 gWeight630 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion 1400 mAh supplied Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion 1400 mAh supplied Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Digilux 2 has the larger sensor area. The Digilux 1 has the lighter body. The Digilux 2 has the higher effective resolution. The Digilux 2 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Digilux 1

Released in 2002, Digilux 1 has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 3.9 MP effective resolution, and a 455 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Digilux 2

Released in 2003, Digilux 2 has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 4.9 MP effective resolution, and a 630 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras