CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Leica D-LUX 2
vs Leica D-LUX 3

Archive illustration for Leica D-LUX 2

Leica / 2005

D-LUX 2

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Leica D-LUX 3

Leica / 2006

D-LUX 3

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

45 mm²
D-LUX 2
45 mm²
D-LUX 3
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The D-LUX 2 and D-LUX 3 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

D-LUX 2MetricD-LUX 3
8.3 MPEffective pixels10 MP
7.76 × 5.81Sensor7.76 × 5.81
2.33 µmPixel pitch2.12 µm
5.43 µm²Pixel area4.51 µm²
18.41 MP/cm²Pixel density22.18 MP/cm²
4.46Crop factor4.46
—Maximum video—
198 gWeight185 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
Lithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The D-LUX 2 and D-LUX 3 have the same sensor area. The D-LUX 3 has the lighter body. The D-LUX 3 has the higher effective resolution. The D-LUX 3 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose D-LUX 2

Released in 2005, D-LUX 2 has about 45 mm² of sensor area, 8.3 MP effective resolution, and a 198 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose D-LUX 3

Released in 2006, D-LUX 3 has about 45 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 185 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras