CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Leica CL
vs Leica TL2

Archive illustration for Leica CL

Leica / 2017

CL

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Leica TL2

Leica / 2017

TL2

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

371 mm²
CL
371 mm²
TL2
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The CL and TL2 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

CLMetricTL2
24.24 MPEffective pixels24.32 MP
23.6 × 15.7Sensor23.6 × 15.7
3.91 µmPixel pitch3.9 µm
15.29 µm²Pixel area15.24 µm²
6.54 MP/cm²Pixel density6.56 MP/cm²
1.53Crop factor1.53
3,840 × 2,160Maximum video3,840 × 2,160
403 gWeight399 g
SD/SDHC/SDXCStorageSD/SDHC/SDXC
BP-DC12 lithium ion batteryBatteryBP-DC13 lithium-ion battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The CL and TL2 have the same sensor area. The TL2 has the lighter body. The TL2 has the higher effective resolution. The CL and TL2 were both released in 2017. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose CL

Released in 2017, CL has about 371 mm² of sensor area, 24.24 MP effective resolution, and a 403 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose TL2

Released in 2017, TL2 has about 371 mm² of sensor area, 24.32 MP effective resolution, and a 399 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras