CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Leica C-LUX 3
vs Leica V-LUX 2

Archive illustration for Leica C-LUX 3

Leica / 2008

C-LUX 3

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Leica V-LUX 2

Leica / 2010

V-LUX 2

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
C-LUX 3
28 mm²
V-LUX 2
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The C-LUX 3 and V-LUX 2 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

C-LUX 3MetricV-LUX 2
10.1 MPEffective pixels14.1 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.66 µmPixel pitch1.4 µm
2.75 µm²Pixel area1.97 µm²
36.43 MP/cm²Pixel density50.86 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
146 gWeight540 g
Internal storageStorageSDHC, SDXC, Secure Digital
Lithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The C-LUX 3 and V-LUX 2 have the same sensor area. The C-LUX 3 has the lighter body. The V-LUX 2 has the higher effective resolution. The V-LUX 2 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose C-LUX 3

Released in 2008, C-LUX 3 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.1 MP effective resolution, and a 146 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose V-LUX 2

Released in 2010, V-LUX 2 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14.1 MP effective resolution, and a 540 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras