CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Konica Revio KD-410Z
vs Rollei d41 com

Archive illustration for Konica Revio KD-410Z

Konica / 2003

Revio KD-410Z

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Rollei d41 com

Rollei / 2001

d41 com

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Revio KD-410Z
38 mm²
d41 com
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Revio KD-410Z and d41 com have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Revio KD-410ZMetricd41 com
4.13 MPEffective pixels4.13 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.03 µmPixel pitch3.03 µm
9.18 µm²Pixel area9.18 µm²
10.9 MP/cm²Pixel density10.9 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
200 gWeight280 g
Memory Stick, MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageCompactFlash type I
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery4x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Revio KD-410Z and d41 com have the same sensor area. The Revio KD-410Z has the lighter body. The Revio KD-410Z and d41 com have the same effective resolution. The Revio KD-410Z is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Revio KD-410Z

Released in 2003, Revio KD-410Z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4.13 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose d41 com

Released in 2001, d41 com has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4.13 MP effective resolution, and a 280 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras