CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Konica Revio KD-410Z
vs Olympus C-40 Zoom

Archive illustration for Konica Revio KD-410Z

Konica / 2003

Revio KD-410Z

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus C-40 Zoom

Olympus / 2001

C-40 Zoom

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Revio KD-410Z
38 mm²
C-40 Zoom
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Revio KD-410Z and C-40 Zoom have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Revio KD-410ZMetricC-40 Zoom
4.13 MPEffective pixels4.13 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
3.03 µmPixel pitch3.03 µm
9.18 µm²Pixel area9.18 µm²
10.9 MP/cm²Pixel density10.9 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
200 gWeight230 g
Memory Stick, MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSmartMedia
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBattery1x CR-V3, 2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Revio KD-410Z and C-40 Zoom have the same sensor area. The Revio KD-410Z has the lighter body. The Revio KD-410Z and C-40 Zoom have the same effective resolution. The Revio KD-410Z is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Revio KD-410Z

Released in 2003, Revio KD-410Z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4.13 MP effective resolution, and a 200 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose C-40 Zoom

Released in 2001, C-40 Zoom has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4.13 MP effective resolution, and a 230 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras