CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Konica Revio KD-25
vs Konica Revio KD-400Z

Archive illustration for Konica Revio KD-25

Konica / 2001

Revio KD-25

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Konica Revio KD-400Z

Konica / 2002

Revio KD-400Z

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Revio KD-25
38 mm²
Revio KD-400Z
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Revio KD-25 and Revio KD-400Z have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Revio KD-25MetricRevio KD-400Z
2.1 MPEffective pixels4.1 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
4.25 µmPixel pitch3.04 µm
18.05 µm²Pixel area9.24 µm²
5.54 MP/cm²Pixel density10.82 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
140 gWeight198 g
Secure DigitalStorageMemory Stick, MultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Revio KD-25 and Revio KD-400Z have the same sensor area. The Revio KD-25 has the lighter body. The Revio KD-400Z has the higher effective resolution. The Revio KD-400Z is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Revio KD-25

Released in 2001, Revio KD-25 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 2.1 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Revio KD-400Z

Released in 2002, Revio KD-400Z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 4.1 MP effective resolution, and a 198 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras