CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Konica Revio KD-210Z
vs Konica Revio KD-310Z

Archive illustration for Konica Revio KD-210Z

Konica / 2002

Revio KD-210Z

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Konica Revio KD-310Z

Konica / 2002

Revio KD-310Z

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Revio KD-210Z
38 mm²
Revio KD-310Z
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Revio KD-210Z and Revio KD-310Z have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

Revio KD-210ZMetricRevio KD-310Z
2.11 MPEffective pixels3.2 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
4.24 µmPixel pitch3.44 µm
17.96 µm²Pixel area11.84 µm²
5.57 MP/cm²Pixel density8.44 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
220 gWeight198 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageMemory Stick, MultiMedia, Secure Digital
2x AABatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Revio KD-210Z and Revio KD-310Z have the same sensor area. The Revio KD-310Z has the lighter body. The Revio KD-310Z has the higher effective resolution. The Revio KD-210Z and Revio KD-310Z were both released in 2002. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Revio KD-210Z

Released in 2002, Revio KD-210Z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 220 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Revio KD-310Z

Released in 2002, Revio KD-310Z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 198 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras