CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Konica Revio KD-210Z
vs Konica Revio KD-25

Archive illustration for Konica Revio KD-210Z

Konica / 2002

Revio KD-210Z

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Konica Revio KD-25

Konica / 2001

Revio KD-25

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
Revio KD-210Z
38 mm²
Revio KD-25
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The Revio KD-210Z and Revio KD-25 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

Revio KD-210ZMetricRevio KD-25
2.11 MPEffective pixels2.1 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
4.24 µmPixel pitch4.25 µm
17.96 µm²Pixel area18.05 µm²
5.57 MP/cm²Pixel density5.54 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
220 gWeight140 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageSecure Digital
2x AABattery2x AA

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The Revio KD-210Z and Revio KD-25 have the same sensor area. The Revio KD-25 has the lighter body. The Revio KD-210Z has the higher effective resolution. The Revio KD-210Z is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose Revio KD-210Z

Released in 2002, Revio KD-210Z has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 2.11 MP effective resolution, and a 220 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose Revio KD-25

Released in 2001, Revio KD-25 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 2.1 MP effective resolution, and a 140 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras