Reasons to choose e-mini D
Released in 2001, e-mini D has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 0.3 MP effective resolution, and a 118 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Konica-Minolta e-mini D
vs Leica Digilux 2
VS
Sensor area
58 mm²
e-mini D58 mm²
Digilux 2- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The e-mini D and Digilux 2 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
e-mini DMetricDigilux 2
0.3 MPEffective pixels4.9 MP
8.8 × 6.6Sensor8.8 × 6.6
13.91 µmPixel pitch3.44 µm
193.6 µm²Pixel area11.85 µm²
0.52 MP/cm²Pixel density8.44 MP/cm²
3.93Crop factor3.93
—Maximum video—
118 gWeight630 g
Internal storageStorageMultiMedia, Secure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryLithium-Ion 1400 mAh supplied Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The e-mini D and Digilux 2 have the same sensor area. The e-mini D has the lighter body. The Digilux 2 has the higher effective resolution. The Digilux 2 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Digilux 2
Released in 2003, Digilux 2 has about 58 mm² of sensor area, 4.9 MP effective resolution, and a 630 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.