Reasons to choose DiMAGE X31
Released in 2004, DiMAGE X31 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 3.2 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Konica-Minolta DiMAGE X31
vs Samsung Digimax 130
VS
Sensor area
15 mm²
DiMAGE X3115 mm²
Digimax 130- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The DiMAGE X31 and Digimax 130 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
DiMAGE X31MetricDigimax 130
3.2 MPEffective pixels1.2 MP
4.5 × 3.37Sensor4.5 × 3.37
2.18 µmPixel pitch3.55 µm
4.74 µm²Pixel area12.64 µm²
21.1 MP/cm²Pixel density7.91 MP/cm²
7.7Crop factor7.7
—Maximum video—
115 gWeight296 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStorageCompactFlash type I
AA (2) batteries (NiMH recommended)BatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH recommended)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The DiMAGE X31 and Digimax 130 have the same sensor area. The DiMAGE X31 has the lighter body. The DiMAGE X31 has the higher effective resolution. The DiMAGE X31 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose Digimax 130
Released in 2002, Digimax 130 has about 15 mm² of sensor area, 1.2 MP effective resolution, and a 296 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.