CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS
vs Kodak EasyShare Z885

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare Z1485 IS

Kodak / 2009

EasyShare Z1485 IS

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare Z885

Kodak / 2007

EasyShare Z885

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

42 mm²
EasyShare Z1485 IS
38 mm²
EasyShare Z885
Area ratio
1.1:1
Absolute difference
4 mm²
Relative difference
9.5%

The EasyShare Z1485 IS has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

EasyShare Z1485 ISMetricEasyShare Z885
14 MPEffective pixels8.1 MP
7.44 × 5.58Sensor7.11 × 5.33
1.72 µmPixel pitch2.16 µm
2.97 µm²Pixel area4.68 µm²
33.72 MP/cm²Pixel density21.37 MP/cm²
4.65Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
164 gWeight161 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageMultiMedia, SDHC, Secure Digital
AA (2) batteries (NiMH Rechargeable batteries)BatteryKodak Lithium-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare Z1485 IS has the larger sensor area. The EasyShare Z885 has the lighter body. The EasyShare Z1485 IS has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare Z1485 IS is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare Z1485 IS

Released in 2009, EasyShare Z1485 IS has about 42 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 164 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EasyShare Z885

Released in 2007, EasyShare Z885 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8.1 MP effective resolution, and a 161 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras