CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare V603
vs Kodak EasyShare LS755

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare V603

Kodak / 2006

EasyShare V603

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare LS755

Kodak / 2004

EasyShare LS755

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

25 mm²
EasyShare V603
25 mm²
EasyShare LS755
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The EasyShare V603 and EasyShare LS755 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

EasyShare V603MetricEasyShare LS755
6.1 MPEffective pixels5 MP
5.75 × 4.32Sensor5.75 × 4.32
2.02 µmPixel pitch2.23 µm
4.07 µm²Pixel area4.97 µm²
24.56 MP/cm²Pixel density20.13 MP/cm²
6.02Crop factor6.02
—Maximum video—
—Weight210 g
Secure DigitalStorageInternal storage
—BatteryKodak Lithium-Ion (included) Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare V603 and EasyShare LS755 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare V603 has the lighter body. The EasyShare V603 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare V603 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare V603

Released in 2006, EasyShare V603 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 6.1 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EasyShare LS755

Released in 2004, EasyShare LS755 has about 25 mm² of sensor area, 5 MP effective resolution, and a 210 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras