CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare P880
vs Olympus FE-250

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare P880

Kodak / 2005

EasyShare P880

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Olympus FE-250

Olympus / 2007

FE-250

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

38 mm²
EasyShare P880
38 mm²
FE-250
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The EasyShare P880 and FE-250 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.

Key specification differences

EasyShare P880MetricFE-250
8 MPEffective pixels8 MP
7.11 × 5.33Sensor7.11 × 5.33
2.18 µmPixel pitch2.18 µm
4.74 µm²Pixel area4.74 µm²
21.11 MP/cm²Pixel density21.11 MP/cm²
4.87Crop factor4.87
—Maximum video—
500 gWeight115 g
MultiMedia, Secure DigitalStoragexD Picture card
Kodak Lithium-Ion, dock Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion rechargeable Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare P880 and FE-250 have the same sensor area. The FE-250 has the lighter body. The EasyShare P880 and FE-250 have the same effective resolution. The FE-250 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare P880

Released in 2005, EasyShare P880 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 500 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose FE-250

Released in 2007, FE-250 has about 38 mm² of sensor area, 8 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras