Reasons to choose EasyShare MX1063
Released in 2008, EasyShare MX1063 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 10.6 MP effective resolution, and a 125 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare MX1063
vs Kodak EasyShare Z980
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare MX106328 mm²
EasyShare Z980- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare MX1063 and EasyShare Z980 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare MX1063MetricEasyShare Z980
10.6 MPEffective pixels12 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.62 µmPixel pitch1.52 µm
2.62 µm²Pixel area2.31 µm²
38.23 MP/cm²Pixel density43.28 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
125 gWeight415 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH Rechargeable batteries)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare MX1063 and EasyShare Z980 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare MX1063 has the lighter body. The EasyShare Z980 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare Z980 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare Z980
Released in 2009, EasyShare Z980 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 415 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.