Reasons to choose EasyShare Mini
Released in 2011, EasyShare Mini has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 99 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare Mini
vs Kodak EasyShare M590
VS
Sensor area
17 mm²
EasyShare Mini17 mm²
EasyShare M590- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare Mini and EasyShare M590 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 1 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare MiniMetricEasyShare M590
10 MPEffective pixels14 MP
4.8 × 3.6Sensor4.8 × 3.6
1.31 µmPixel pitch1.11 µm
1.73 µm²Pixel area1.23 µm²
57.87 MP/cm²Pixel density81.02 MP/cm²
7.21Crop factor7.21
—Maximum video—
99 gWeight99 g
Internal storageStorageInternal storage
Lithium-Ion KLIC-7006 rechargeable battery Li-ion batteryBatteryLithium-Ion KLIC-7006 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare Mini and EasyShare M590 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare Mini and EasyShare M590 have the same body weight. The EasyShare M590 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare Mini is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare M590
Released in 2010, EasyShare M590 has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 99 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.