Reasons to choose EasyShare MD30
Released in 2009, EasyShare MD30 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.2 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare MD30
vs Kodak EasyShare Z980
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare MD3028 mm²
EasyShare Z980- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare MD30 and EasyShare Z980 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
Key specification differences
EasyShare MD30MetricEasyShare Z980
12.2 MPEffective pixels12 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.51 µmPixel pitch1.52 µm
2.27 µm²Pixel area2.31 µm²
44 MP/cm²Pixel density43.28 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
130 gWeight415 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryAA (4) batteries (NiMH Rechargeable batteries)
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare MD30 and EasyShare Z980 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare MD30 has the lighter body. The EasyShare MD30 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare MD30 and EasyShare Z980 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose EasyShare Z980
Released in 2009, EasyShare Z980 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 415 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.