CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare MD30
vs Kodak EasyShare MD41

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare MD30

Kodak / 2009

EasyShare MD30

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare MD41

Kodak / 2009

EasyShare MD41

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
EasyShare MD30
28 mm²
EasyShare MD41
Area ratio
1:1
Absolute difference
0 mm²
Relative difference
0%

The EasyShare MD30 and EasyShare MD41 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.

Key specification differences

EasyShare MD30MetricEasyShare MD41
12.2 MPEffective pixels12.2 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.51 µmPixel pitch1.51 µm
2.27 µm²Pixel area2.27 µm²
44 MP/cm²Pixel density44 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
130 gWeight115 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageSDHC, Secure Digital
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-Ion Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare MD30 and EasyShare MD41 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare MD41 has the lighter body. The EasyShare MD30 and EasyShare MD41 have the same effective resolution. The EasyShare MD30 and EasyShare MD41 were both released in 2009. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare MD30

Released in 2009, EasyShare MD30 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.2 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EasyShare MD41

Released in 2009, EasyShare MD41 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12.2 MP effective resolution, and a 115 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras