CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare Max Z990
vs Kodak EasyShare Sport

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare Max Z990

Kodak / 2011

EasyShare Max Z990

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare Sport

Kodak / 2011

EasyShare Sport

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
EasyShare Max Z990
28 mm²
EasyShare Sport
Area ratio
1.03:1
Absolute difference
1 mm²
Relative difference
2.6%

The EasyShare Sport has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

EasyShare Max Z990MetricEasyShare Sport
12 MPEffective pixels12 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.16 × 4.62
1.52 µmPixel pitch1.54 µm
2.31 µm²Pixel area2.37 µm²
43.28 MP/cm²Pixel density42.17 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.62
—Maximum video—
—Weight175 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageInternal storage
4x AABattery2 x AA batteries alkaline, lithium, or Ni-MH

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare Sport has the larger sensor area. The EasyShare Max Z990 has the lighter body. The EasyShare Max Z990 and EasyShare Sport have the same effective resolution. The EasyShare Max Z990 and EasyShare Sport were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare Max Z990

Released in 2011, EasyShare Max Z990 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EasyShare Sport

Released in 2011, EasyShare Sport has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 175 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras