CameraLore
Side-by-side comparison

Kodak EasyShare Max Z990
vs Kodak EasyShare Mini

Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare Max Z990

Kodak / 2011

EasyShare Max Z990

Full specifications
VS
Archive illustration for Kodak EasyShare Mini

Kodak / 2011

EasyShare Mini

Full specifications

Sensor area

Calibrate screen size

Enter your display diagonal so sensor rectangles are shown closer to their physical size.

28 mm²
EasyShare Max Z990
17 mm²
EasyShare Mini
Area ratio
1.6:1
Absolute difference
10 mm²
Relative difference
60.4%

The EasyShare Max Z990 has the larger sensor area. More area usually means greater light-gathering potential, though real image quality still depends on sensor architecture and generation.

Key specification differences

EasyShare Max Z990MetricEasyShare Mini
12 MPEffective pixels10 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor4.8 × 3.6
1.52 µmPixel pitch1.31 µm
2.31 µm²Pixel area1.73 µm²
43.28 MP/cm²Pixel density57.87 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor7.21
—Maximum video—
—Weight99 g
SDHC, Secure DigitalStorageInternal storage
4x AABatteryLithium-Ion KLIC-7006 rechargeable battery Li-ion battery

Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.

How to choose between these cameras

The EasyShare Max Z990 has the larger sensor area. The EasyShare Max Z990 has the lighter body. The EasyShare Max Z990 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare Max Z990 and EasyShare Mini were both released in 2011. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.

Reasons to choose EasyShare Max Z990

Released in 2011, EasyShare Max Z990 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Reasons to choose EasyShare Mini

Released in 2011, EasyShare Mini has about 17 mm² of sensor area, 10 MP effective resolution, and a 99 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.

Choose different cameras