Reasons to choose EasyShare M583
Released in 2011, EasyShare M583 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 14 MP effective resolution, and a 0 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.
Side-by-side comparison
Kodak EasyShare M583
vs Olympus FE-5010
VS
Sensor area
28 mm²
EasyShare M58328 mm²
FE-5010- Area ratio
- 1:1
- Absolute difference
- 0 mm²
- Relative difference
- 0%
The EasyShare M583 and FE-5010 have the same sensor area. Compare pixel density, sensor architecture, and release generation to understand likely image-quality differences.
These cameras were released 2 years apart. Consider sensor generation when comparing pixel metrics.
Key specification differences
EasyShare M583MetricFE-5010
14 MPEffective pixels12 MP
6.08 × 4.56Sensor6.08 × 4.56
1.41 µmPixel pitch1.52 µm
1.98 µm²Pixel area2.31 µm²
50.5 MP/cm²Pixel density43.28 MP/cm²
5.69Crop factor5.69
—Maximum video—
—Weight130 g
microSD, microSDHCStoragexD Picture card
Li-Ion Li-ion batteryBatteryLi-ion Rechargeable Battery (LI-42B) Li-ion battery
Amber marks the value that is generally preferable in this comparison context. It is not an overall camera score.
How to choose between these cameras
The EasyShare M583 and FE-5010 have the same sensor area. The EasyShare M583 has the lighter body. The EasyShare M583 has the higher effective resolution. The EasyShare M583 is the newer release. Also consider the lens system and subjects you shoot.
Reasons to choose FE-5010
Released in 2009, FE-5010 has about 28 mm² of sensor area, 12 MP effective resolution, and a 130 g body. Use these values to narrow the field, not as an overall image-quality score.